This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow News Release
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gebbie, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by White, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gebbie, K. M.
Right arrow Articles by White, K. M.

Special Focus

Adapting Standards of Care Under Extreme Conditions

Kristine M. Gebbie, DrPH, RN, Cheryl A. Peterson, RN, MSN, Italo Subbarao, DO, MBA and Kathleen M. White, PhD, RN, CNAA-BC

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr Kristine M. Gebbie, Hunter College, City University of New York, 425 E 25th St, Room 530W, New York, NY 10010 (e-mail: kgebbie{at}hunter.cuny.edu).

The filing of criminal charges against a group of clinicians in New Orleans for failure to meet expected standards of care following the hurricanes of 2005 made the growing concern among health professionals about care provided during extreme emergencies or disasters all too real. Questions about what may lead to censure, penalties from licensing boards, or lawsuits have come from nurses, physicians, and many other licensed health professionals. A panel convened by the American Nurses Association that included representatives of medical, public health, hospital, and government agencies considered the ethical, professional, and practical aspects of meeting standards of care in such circumstances. Clinicians are reminded that in emergencies, it is only the circumstances that change (perhaps radically); neither the individual’s professional competency nor the basic professional standard of care is different. In making prioritized decisions under such circumstances, the individual’s ethical framework is utilitarian, and there are 3 areas for action, even when some routine tasks are set aside: maintain worker and patient safety; maintain airway, breathing, and circulation; and establish or maintain infection control. Policy recommendations such as state legislation for the adoption of comprehensive immunity for volunteer health care workers, and the establishment of a medical review panel as arbitration board are also suggested. The resulting white paper summarizes the issues and provides guidance to individual professionals, institutions in which they work, and emergency planners.

Key Words: disaster • emergency • ethics • professional standards • standards of care • preparedness




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 dmphpHome page
J. J. James
From the Editor-in-Chief
Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness, June 1, 2009; 3(2): 64 - 65.
[Full Text] [PDF]